Show admin view
Report on the fitness of WP.29 Regulations and Global Technical Regulations for their application to automated vehicles
Document GRVA/2023/18
14 July 2023

This document summarises the reviews conducted by the GR working parties on the fitness for ADS of UN Regulations and GTR for application to ADS vehicles. This document represents the current opinions of the experts at the time of submission, and the recommendations contained inside may evolve significantly during the next steps of the process of reviewing and amending Regulations.

Submitted by China, CLEPA, France, Germany, Japan, Netherlands, OICA, and UK
Download document
Previous Documents, Discussions, and Outcomes
4. (e) | Coordination of work on automation between working parties (GRs)

30. The representative of France, Co-Chair of the Task Force (TF) on the Fitness for ADS of GRVA Regulations and Global Technical Regulations (FADS), presented the status report of the Group (GRVA-17-29). He detailed the context and the purpose of the work done, he introduced the final report of the first phase of activities, (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2023/18). He detailed the proposed next phases for the group.

31. The representative of Japan inquired why the group proposed to start amending UN Regulations Nos. 13, 13-H and 79 for dual mode vehicles, as it had not been needed for ALKS.

32. The representative of the United States of America recalled that the purpose of the group, in its first phase, was to identify the obstacles in UN Global Technical Regulations (GTRs) and UN Regulations for ADS and that the purpose of the second phase would be to remove these obstacles. He recalled that the IWG on FRAV did not provide a definition for dual mode vehicles.

33. The representative of ITU clarified that dual modes vehicles were vehicles with the possibility for Transition of Control (ToC).

34. The representative of France mentioned that vehicles equipped with an Automated Valet Parking feature would also be understood as dual mode vehicles.

35. The representatives of Canada and the United States of America cautioned on the use of the term dual mode.

36. GRVA recalled that the term was used in the guidance provided in informal document GRVA-14-54/Rev.1 when these activities were initiated, but was indeed not part of the guidelines and regulations under the scope of GRVA.

37. GRVA agreed that the TF on FADS would prioritize its activities by reviewing UN Regulations Nos. 13-H, 13 and 79, focusing on vehicles equipped both with an ADS and normal equipment for manual driving.

38. GRVA endorsed the report of the group (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2023/18).

Related and Previous Documents
FADS-13-07
Relates to Regulation Screening for ADS |